ISSN 2312-5160
IN ENGLISH
ПРАВИЛА ДЛЯ АВТОРІВ - УКРАЇНСЬКОЮ

Indexed in

Index Copernicus
Google Scolar
Maksymovych Scientific Library
Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine

Current Issues of Mass Communication, 2017, no. 22, pp. 71-81

ISSN 2312-5160

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/2312-5160.2017.22.71-81

Full text, PDF (in English)


Methodology-Related Problems in Scientific Research

Oksana Romakh

Institute of Journalism, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 36/1 Melnikova str., 04119 Kyiv, Ukraine

* Corresponding author’s e-mail address: karpati[@]ukr.net

 

ABSTRACT

On the basis of quantitative and qualitative analysis of twenty two dissertations for PhD degree, we studied the methodology-related problems in scientific research.

Our study included the following analyses of the empirical sources: estimating the quality of the methodology description in the introduction of dissertations; analysing the correlation between proposed methodology and tasks of the dissertations; estimating the relevance of methodology with the objectives; studying the correlation between the methods indicated in the introduction and the methods actually applied in the main text of dissertations; analysing the relevance of the research procedure; estimating the reliability of the research results.

For better indication of the whole situation the outputs of our study were presented in a table. Conclusions were made on the correspondence of the analysed dissertations with the scientific criteria of objectivity, validity, rationality, systematic and methodological relevance.

Based on our research, we indicated the following methodology-related problems in scientific research: insufficient description of the relevance of chosen methodology; in some cases the total lack of section with description of the applied methodology; the lack of correlation between tasks and methods; inappropriate use of methods; the lack of correlation between methods described in the introduction and those applied in the main text of the dissertations; the complete or partial absence of the description of research procedure that makes impossible to reproduce the research; the undifferentiated use of terms “method”, “reception”, and “approach”. The presence of these problems makes it difficult to meet the basic requirement for the scientific research, and the objectivity, validity, rationality, systematic and methodological relevance of such research remains questionable. In our view, a scientist who begins the research should already possess certain skills, knowledge and competencies in methodology. The development of these competences lies within the responsibility of the higher educational institutions, but should be also included in students’ and postgraduate/doctoral students’ self-education.

Our work is the first empirical-based study that examined the validity and reliability of the methodology applied in scientific research in the field of social communications. It results proves that scientific research in this field need significant improvement in use of methodology.

 

KEYWORDS: research methodology; social communication; validity; reliability of research results.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Chernenko, K.U., Storozhev, Y.V., Sivolobov, M.A. (1969), Handbook of Party Worker, Publishing House of Political Literature, Moscow, 576 p.
  2. Ivanov, V.F. (2003), Sociology of Mass Communication, ChSU Publishing House, Cherkasy, 380 p.
  3. Kornieiev, V.M., (2015), “Perspective Directions of Scientific Development of the Field Social Communications”, Education of the region, no 3-4, pp. 61-69.
  4. Rizun,V.V. (2012), “To the Statement of the Scientific Problem about the Special Status of Media Communications (Mass Communication) in the System of Social Communications”, Professor Volodymyr Rizuns scientific page, available at: http://journlib.univ.kiev.ua/ Do_postanovky_problemy.pdf (accessed 01 December 2017).
  5. Rizun, V.V. (2012), “Essays on the Methodology of Research in Social Communications”, Psycholinguistics, no 10, pp. 305-314, available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ psling_2012_10_44 (accessed 01 December 2017)
  6. Rizun, V.V. (2013), “On the Issue of Social Communication Scientific Problems and on Scientific Problems in General”, Scientific notes of the Institute of Journalism, no 52, pp. 10-17, available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nzizh_2013_52_3 (accessed 20 November 2017)
  7. Rizun, V.V., Skotnykova, T.V. (2013), “Methods of Social Communication Studies”, Scientific Notes of the Institute of Journalism, no 52, pp. 49-53, available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nzizh_2013_52_8 (accessed 22 November 2017).
  8. Khylko, M.M. (2013), “Current Situation of Domestic Research in the Field of Social Communications”, Scientific Notes of the Institute of Journalism, no 52, pp. 111-116, available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nzizh_2013_52_20 (accessed 26 November 2017).
  9. Khylko, M.M. (2013), “Application of the Method of Content Analysis in Journalistic Research”, Journalism, no 20, pp. 29-34.
  10. Arutyunov, V.KH., Svintsitsky V.M. (2003), Philosophy of Global Problems of the Present, KNEU, Kyiv, 90 p.
  11. Philosophy. Ukrainian world-view accent: A Textbook for Students at Higher Educational Institutions (2006), in Bilodad M. (Ed.), Condor, Kyiv, 356 p.
  12. Kuzmenko, G.N. (2014), Philosophy and Methodology of Science: Textbook for Magistracy, Yurayt Publishing House, Moscow, 450 p.
  13. Shcherba, S.P., Shchedrin, V.K., Zaglada, O.A. (2004), Philosophy. Teaching Manual for Students at Higher Educational Institutions, MAUP, Kyiv, 216 p.
  14. Higher Attestation Commission of Ukraine (2011), “Requirements for Theses and Abstracts of Dissertations”, Bulletin of the Higher Attestation Commission of Ukraine, no 9/10, available at: http://www.niss.gov.ua/public/File/aspirantura/vumogu_dusert.pdf
  15. Rizun, V.V., Skotnykova, T.V. (2005). Methods of Scientific Research in Journalism, The Institute of Journalism, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, 97 р.
  16. Bilodid, I.K. (1977), Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language in 11 Volumes, volume 11, Scientific Opinion, Kyiv.

 

Comments are closed.